I recently read a post claiming to bust “10 pseudo-science
theories”. However, like many posts claiming to be science based, claiming to be about
science it is actually a ‘pseudo-pseudo-science’ post, presenting many ‘pseudo-pseudo-science’ theories. Many people commented
on the post, most with simple statements like
‘great’ and others with minor complaints.
To be honest, when I first read the post, I thought – this
makes some sense, but the author(s)? have made a few simple errors. As I read the post over, and over, and
over again, I found more holes, more nonsense, more ‘pseudo-pseudo-science’
with each re-read.
If you want to test your own sense of science, you can read
the post here. Of courses internet posts
are always ‘subject to change’, so by the time you read this, the post might
have changed. I often improve on my posts after they are published.
10 Pseudo-Science Theories We'd Like to See Retired Forever
If you have seen this post before, no matter what you thought, you might be very surprised by my conclusions - I have read the post at least 5 times. I have taken the time to research many of the points, the words, the ideas and the sciences discussed therein.
